Dow Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Hollow, ornamented earthenware figures of Buddha, each figure accompanied by a package of 100 sticks of incense and a small earthenware tray, which serves as a base for the Buddha, were classified by the collector of customs at the port of Seattle as entireties and were assessed for duty at 40 per cent ad valorem as decorated earthenware under the provisions of paragraph 79 of the tariff act of 1913, which said paragraph in so far as pertinent reads as follows:
79. Earthenware * * * including * * * ornaments, toys, charms, vases, statues, statuettes, * * * and all other articles composed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Butler Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- F. T. Griswold Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.