Legal Opinion

Zygar v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 13, 2000No. 16-98-08994; CA A105018PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

In this action on an earnest money agreement for the sale of property, the trial court granted defendant buyer’s motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs sellers’ claim for breach of contract based on buyer’s refusal to complete the sale. Sellers appeal. We review the summary judgment record in the light most favorable to sellers to determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether buyer was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47 C; Jones v. General Motors Corp., 325 Or 404, 420, 939 P2d 608 (1997). We affirm.

The following facts are relevant to this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stevens v. ForenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bike Fashion Corp. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Klamath Off-Project Water Users, Inc. v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Morrow v. Red Shield InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  5. Gibson v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API