Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2001)

California Attorney General Reports

Decided August 24, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

BILL LOCKYER Attorney General GREGORY L. GONOT Deputy Attorney General

THE HONORABLE TOM TORLAKSON, MEMBER OF THE STATE SENATE, has requested an opinion on the following questions:

1. Where a natural hazard disclosure statement is required in the sale of residential property, how soon after the acceptance of the buyer's offer is the seller required to deliver the statement?

2. If the seller is required to deliver a natural hazard disclosure statement but fails to do so by the time transfer of title is to take place, may the buyer terminate his or her offer to purchase the property?

CONCLUSIONS

1.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. ValladoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API