Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Dinardo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1963No. Appeals, Nos. 22 and 23PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A Pittsburgh police car, operated by Patrolman Cyrus Cramer, came into collision with an automobile owned by Dominick Dinardo and operated by his son Thomas Dinardo. Cramer brought an action of trespass against Thomas Dinardo for personal injuries; the City of Pittsburgh sued Thomas Dinardo for damages sustained to its vehicle; Dominick Dinardo sued Cyrus Cramer in one action and the City of Pittsburgh in another action for his property damage.

The four cases were consolidated for trial. The jury in open court orally announced in Case No. 1 that both drivers were negligent.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Eastley v. GlennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Rottmund v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Snaman v. Donahoe's IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hornak v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Eulo v. Deval Aerodynamics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Palmer v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Barefoot v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Palmer v. MosesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API