Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Moses

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 88 and 89PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

In tMs appeal, the issue is whether the lower court properly granted a mistrial on the basis that the series of verdict slips lacked certainty.

The verdict slips are set out in footnote 2 of the dissenting opinion. We have examined the record and studied the submitted slips, and we are not convinced that they reveal such a clearly expressed intent. The trial court, after receiving the multiple slips and reading them together, concluded: “I do believe that in view of the series of matters that have now transpired that it is impossible to say with certainty that tMs jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Canonsburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. East Broad Top Transit Co. v. FloodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Thompson v. IannuzziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. May v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Wadatz, Admrx. v. TaorminaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API