Snaman v. Donahoe's Incorporated
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
It is well established that a party may waive, or will be held to have waived, the right to assert that error in a trial was harmful. If, instead of objecting to action of the trial court in time to avoid erroneous ruling, a party remains silent and takes his chances with the jury, he will not generally be permitted to assert, after a disappointing result, that he is entitled to another trial in which he may object. Illustrations of the application of the rule are given in a note at the foot of this opinion. The record calls for the application of that rule.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RazmusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Bradwell v. Pittsb. Etc. Pass. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Mastel v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Rottmund v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eastley v. GlennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Havranek v. PitssburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Finn v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Wellitz v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Com. Ex Rel. Moska v. MoskaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.