Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Neel, Stephen E., J.
This litigation arises out of improper option and margin trading by defendant Daniel Carpenter (Carpenter) of the plaintiffs’ monies held by Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co., Inc. (Benistar) in qualified intermediary escrow accounts pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §1031(a)(3). Beginning in 1998, Benistar deposited the funds in margin accounts at Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch or Merrill) and used the funds to engage in aggressive, high-risk uncovered option trading. Ultimately, Benistar lost more than $8 million of the plaintiffs’ money.3 These…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. AEP Power Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Maisenbacker v. Society ConcordiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.