Allstate Insurance Co. v. Falgoust
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The household exclusion in a homeowner's policy bars from liability coverage the claims of an "insured person" against the named insured. "Insured person" includes "any dependent person in [the named insured's] care" "if a resident of [the named insured's] household." The question presented is whether a foster child is an "insured person" under the household exclusion. We answer in the affirmative. Foster children readily meet the "insured person" definition, and other jurisdictions have so held.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
This is a declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. TeelAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Williams v. CrawfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Anchorage Chrysler Center, Inc. v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. DowdyAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- United Services Automobile Association v. NearyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Rigby v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- KICC-Alcan General, Joint Venture v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 2017
- Ball v. Allstate Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.