Legal Opinion
MacK v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1968No. Civ. 24998PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.
Petitioners, landowner-defendants in an eminent domain proceeding, seek a writ of prohibition to restrain respondent court from enforcing an order requiring petitioners to disclose, in answer to interrogatories, the following information about a real estate appraisal obtained by petitioners’ former attorney: (1) the appraiser’s name and address; (2) the date he was hired; (3) whether he rendered an opinion of the fair market value of the property sought to be condemned; and (4) the appraiser’s opinion of the fair market value of the property. In opposition to real party in interest State of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swartzman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Kenney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- San Diego Professional Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Coito v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Fellows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Lohman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.