Legal Opinion
People v. Thompson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 1935No. Civ. 5215PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This appeal involves the correctness of a judgment of the trial court dismissing an action in eminent domain, in which action the plaintiff sought to take from the defendants certain of their property known as the “Hargrave Ranch”, situate on the Mendocino coast in Mendocino County, and add the same to the State Park System in Mendocino County known as “Russian Gulch State Park”. In the eminent domain action the plaintiff had judgment for the condemnation of the property. The cause was tried by a jury, and the value of the property fixed at $3,500. Severance damages were allowed in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960
- Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- MacK v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Moon v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.