Legal Opinion
Kenney v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1967No. Docket Nos. 11684, 11702PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
In these consolidated mandamus petitions petitioner, defendant in an action for medical malpractice, seeks to prevent discovery by plaintiff (real party in interest) of certain materials and certain information. The subjects are suitable for separate discussion.
Re Sufficiency of the Affidavit Supporting the Subpoena Duces Tecum. (No. 11702)
At a preliminary to the taking of the deposition of the record custodian of the Yolo County Hospital plaintiff sought a subpoena duces tecum covering hospital records relating to defendant doctor. The latter moved to quash, contending insufficiency of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Associated Brewers Distributing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Robinson v. MagovernDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Alexander v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Matchett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. MisevchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.