People v. Senegram
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Gavin W. Craig, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of perjury, and appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It appears that one S. Bauman was an employee of the Senegram Company, a corporation, of which defendant was president. Some one telephoned the company, expressing a desire to sell a lot of copper wire and designated a certain saloon in Los Angeles as the place where negotiations could be conducted for its purchase. Bauman met the party and purchased the wire, which as a matter of fact had been stolen from some point in Arizona. Thereafter a complaint was filed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. Lem YouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. Von TiedemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. Wong ChueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. MetzlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Phillips.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- People v. DunstanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- People v. MizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- In Re BraynardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. LantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.