Legal Opinion

People v. Mizer

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1940No. Crim. 1709PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial after a verdict was rendered finding him guilty of perjury. The motion was presented on the grounds that (1) the court misdirected the jury in a matter of law, (2) the court erred in the decision of questions of law in the course of the trial, and (3) the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence. The judgment was •suspended and the defendant was granted probation for the term of three years subject to his service for six months in the Stanislaus County road camp.

The defendant was charged with perjury consisting of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SenegramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. People v. PahrmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. LaMarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. People v. HoltzendorffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API