Legal Opinion

People v. Wong Chuey

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1897No. Crim. No. 206PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The defendant has been convicted of murder of the second degree, and appeals to this court. He presents for our consideration many alleged errors of law occurring during the progress of the trial.- We will address ourselves to those which we deem of sufficient importance to demand special notice.

1. Certain witnesses for defendant gave evidence as to the facts and circumstances of the homicide. The prosecution sought to impeach their evidence by showing that a passing freight train obscured their view of the killing. To establish the fact that a freight train was passing the point where the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. Fong Ah SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. AlcaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State v. VarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. GarbuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People v. PutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API