Legal Opinion

People v. Von Tiedeman

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1898No. Crim. No. 346PublishedCited by 38 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a now trial. William T. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The defendant has been convicted of the crime of perjury, and appeals to this court. The present prosecution was occasioned by the following circumstances: Defendant was upon trial charged with the crime of having knowingly offered to he filed for record and registration in the recorder’s *130office of the city and county of San Francisco a forged deed, purporting to be a deed of conveyance of a certain described block of land by one Harriet P. Christy, grantor, to one Horace George Pratt, grantee. In that trial defendant admitted that he participated in certain transactions pertaining to this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Ah BeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Commonwealth v. CornishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1814

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. In Re ImblerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. KobrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API