Legal Opinion

Coleman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 28, 2003No. CR-01-2065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and WISE, J., concur; COBB, J., concurs in part and concurs in the result in part, with opinion, which SHAW, J., joins.

2Concurrence · CobbCobb, J.

John Stephen Coleman was indicted for capital murder, but was convicted of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter, a violation of §13A-6-3(a)(2), Ala. Code 1975. Coleman contends that the trial court erred in refusing his requested jury instruction on "causal connection."

I concur in the result to Part II of the majority's unpublished memorandum because I disagree with the majority's conclusion that Coleman failed to…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Shaw.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Molton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Hemphill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Bullock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Toles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HatfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. Booker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ex Parte NallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ex Parte NallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API