Legal Opinion · Dissent
Ex Parte Nalls
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 6, 2011No. 1100629Published
1DissentCobb, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent. In this case the trial court responded to the statement by the defendant, William Floyd Nalls, Jr., that he wanted to reserve an issue for appeal by stating:
“I understand you want to challenge whether ... the fact that you pled guilty years ago to the sex crime would make you subject to the [Community Notification Act (‘CNA’) ], because this was subsequently passed by the legislature.... I’ll make a note that you want to reserve that issue for appeal.”
Nalls states in his petition for certiorari review that he argued on appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeals that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Monroe v. Valhalla Cemetery Company, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- IEC Arab Alabama, Inc. v. City of ArabCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Jefferson County Commission v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.