Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Nalls
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 6, 2011No. 1100629Published
1Opinion of the Court
72 So.3d 603 (2011)
Ex parte William Floyd NALLS, Jr.
(In re William Floyd Nails, Jr. v. State of Alabama).
1100629.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
May 6, 2011.
Laura K. Segers of Turner, Webb & Roberts, P.C., Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.
Submitted on petitioner's brief only.
WOODALL, Justice.
WRIT DENIED.
STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, MURDOCK, and SHAW, JJ., concur.
2DissentCobb, C.J.
MAIN and WISE, JJ., recuse themselves.[*]
WOODALL, Justice (concurring specially).
I concur specially to point out that the Chief Justice's dissent is based on her misunderstanding of the holding in the Court of Criminal Appeals' unpublished memorandum…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Monroe v. Valhalla Cemetery Company, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- IEC Arab Alabama, Inc. v. City of ArabCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.