Brune v. Vom Lehn
New York Supreme Court
Action to compel specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
There is no dispute that the plaintiff had a lease of defendant’s property, which contained a provision giving him the option to purchase. While *343it is disputed that any new arrangement was made between the parties the court finds as a fact that shortly after the plaintiff’s lease was executed the parties did agree that the option to purchase should be canceled and that a new lease should be executed extending the plaintiff’s term, but giving him the right to terminate the lease at certain periods, all in consideration of the defendant making material and costly changes and improvements in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Woolley v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Marks v. . CowdinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Fleming v. GilbertNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- 300 West End Avenue Corp. v. WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- 300 West End Avenue Corp. v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Sill v. Ocala Jewelers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- McTague v. ConroyNew York Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.