Legal Opinion
McTague v. Conroy
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The complaint sufficiently alleges the breach of an agreement on the part of the defendant to accept title and seeks to recover damages therefor. The memorandum sued upon is an enforcible agreement. It sets forth a description of the property, the payment of $5,000 on account of the purchase price, $10,000 on the signing of the contract, $21,000 by taking the property subject to existing mortgages for that amount, $22,750 by a purchase-money mortgage for three years, “to be drawn in the usual way and under the usual conditions. Made by the purchaser or assigns,” and the balance of $34,250 in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Mesibov, Glinert & Levy v. Cohen Bros. Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- 300 West End Avenue Corp. v. WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Ansorge v. BelferNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 300 West End Avenue Corp. v. WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- McLean v. KesslerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980