Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Eastman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 2003No. 2002-778PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Lewis, J.) denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for personal injury. See SUP. Ct. R. 8. The defendant, Donna Eastman, argues that the court should have granted her motion because the plaintiffs, Maria and Terry Donnelly, failed to file suit within the time allowed under the statute of limitations. See RSA 508:4 (1997); SUPER. Ct. R. 2. We reverse and remand.

Upon review of the ruling on this motion to dismiss, we assume the following facts to be true for purposes of this appeal. Guglielmo v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Glines v. BrukSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Hodgdon v. Beatrice D. Weeks Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. West Gate Village Ass'n v. DubiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perez v. Pike Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Cardinal Development Corp. v. Town of Winchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. Anna H. Cardone Revocable Trust v. CardoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. LEBARON v. WightSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. WINECELLAR FARM, INC. v. HibbardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API