Legal Opinion
Cardinal Development Corp. v. Town of Winchester Zoning Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 8, 2008No. 2007-849PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The petitioner, Cardinal Development Corporation (Cardinal), appeals an order of the Superior Court (Arnold, J.) dismissing its appeal from the Winchester Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) for lack of jurisdiction, due to the untimely filing of a motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
The record supports the following relevant facts. On November 28,2006, Cardinal applied to the ZBA for a special exception to excavate loam, sand, gravel and stone. The ZBA held a hearing and denied the application on January 4,2007. Cardinal then had thirty days, beginning the following day, to move for rehearing…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Holman v. Chevaillier's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- City of Overland Park v. NikiasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- In Re GubelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- City of Concord v. TompkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Mountain Home Beagle Media v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Zachary G.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Atwater v. Town of PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Radziewicz v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Bosonetto v. Town of RichmondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Bartlett v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.