Glines v. Bruk
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
This is an interlocutory appeal from a ruling in the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) dismissing the plaintiff’s action against defendants Barry Hyman, Inc. (Hyman) and Chestnut Hill Construction, Inc. (Chestnut Hill) based on the statute of limitations. We affirm and remand.
*181The parties certified the following facts. On August 15, 1988, the plaintiff, Richard Glines, an employee of Service Merchandise, Inc., injured his back while attempting to lift a mechanized loading dock. He brought suit in February 1990 against the owner of the premises, defendant Paul Bruk, Jr., trustee of B.C.L.M. Realty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Olson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Rowe v. John DeereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- McCollum v. D'ArcySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Furbush v. McKittrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Lamprey v. Britton Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Perez v. Pike Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.