Legal Opinion

Michaux v. R. G. Lassiter & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoice, C. J.

Tbe evidence tended to show that defendant is a corporation extensively engaged in tbe construction of roads and streets, and in May, 1922, in tbe line of its business, was at work in repairing tbe streets of Greensboro, using for that purpose, among other appliances, a mixer or road paver. This paver was a detached machine working by its own mechanical power and consisting chiefly of tbe engine, a revolving drum and a large pan or skip which, in tbe beginning of tbe operation, rests upon tbe ground so that tbe differing ingredients, sand and gravel, etc., can be unloaded into it from tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Jones v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Walters v. Durham Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Thompson v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Gaither v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Perkins v. Spray Wood & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Taylor v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API