Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Spray Wood & Coal Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNoa, J.

Appellant, Hedrick Construction Company, upon its appeal in this case, relies upon three contentions, discussed in the brief filed in this Court, each of which is presented by assignments of error, based upon exceptions appearing in the statement of the case on appeal. Appellant did not offer evidence upon the trial. The issues were submitted to the jury solely upon the evidence offered by plaintiff. There is no serious controversy as to the facts, which this evidence tends to establish.

The first contention is that there was no evidence of actionable negligence on the part of the appellant.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Vassor v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Maxson v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Steele v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Taylor v. Tallahassee Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Spicer v. . WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Rea v. . SimowitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Larson v. Independent School District No. 11JIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API