Legal Opinion

Gándara v. Gándara Cartagena

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided May 8, 1936No. 6814Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchison

In a filiation suit, plaintiffs and defendants entered into a compromise and settlement of a second cause of action for the recovery of an inheritance. Later, plaintiffs brought the present action for the recovery of their proportionate shares in a certain property which they alleged defendants in the filiation suit had maliciously and in had faith excluded from the offer of compromise! ’ Plaintiffs also alleged that they had subsequently discovered this property.

*879The district judge sustained a demurrer to an amended complaint for want of facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pitts v. National Independent Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Huffman v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Heinrich v. HeinrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Nimey v. NimeyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Smith v. Cherokee Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API