Gándara v. Gándara Cartagena
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchison
In a filiation suit, plaintiffs and defendants entered into a compromise and settlement of a second cause of action for the recovery of an inheritance. Later, plaintiffs brought the present action for the recovery of their proportionate shares in a certain property which they alleged defendants in the filiation suit had maliciously and in had faith excluded from the offer of compromise! ’ Plaintiffs also alleged that they had subsequently discovered this property.
*879The district judge sustained a demurrer to an amended complaint for want of facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pitts v. National Independent Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Huffman v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Heinrich v. HeinrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Nimey v. NimeyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Smith v. Cherokee Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.