Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cherokee Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1919No. 10677PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Houston county—Judge Riley. May 28, 1919. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. If one who has several different demands against another accepts payment of one or more and gives a receipt therefor, there being at the time no mention of the other demands, a mere recital in the receipt that it is in full payment of all claims to date is without consideration so far as relates to an unsettled note signed by the party making the payment and another which was not mentioned nor in the minds of the parties at 'the time of such settlement, and the signing of the receipt does not estop the holder of the unsettled demand from asserting that demand; nor does the signing of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armour & Co. v. Ross & BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. FordhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Matthews v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Goodwine v. AyresIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Crooke v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Gilpin v. Swainsboro Ice Fuel Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API