Pitts v. National Independent Fisheries Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action in debt. Judgment for plaintiff. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of the .City and County of Denver, Hon. Julian H. Moore, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
This is an action by a seller against the buyer to recover for goods sold and delivered. The answer pleads payment, and also sets up a plea'of accord and satisfaction. A trial to the court resulted in findings for plaintiff, and a judgment in its favor for $978.43. The defendant has sued out this writ of error, and the cause is before us on his application for a supersedeas.
*317The plaintiff in error, defendant below, contends that the court erred in not finding that there had been an accord and satisfaction.
The plaintiff below sold and delivered to defendant various quantities of fish, at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Worcester Color Co. v. Henry Wood's Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re Unioil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Hudson v. American Founders Life Ins. Co. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Estate Landscape & Snow Removal Specialists, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. HollenbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.