Legal Opinion

Lacy v. Bentsen

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 16, 1993No. 93-CV-71736-DTPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., Chief Judge.

On September 17, 1993, the Defendants, Lloyd Bentsen (the Secretary of Treasury) and the Government, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. On October 21, 1993, the Plaintiff, Mary L. Lacy, filed an untimely response. A reply brief followed.

For the reasons that have been set forth below, this Court will grant the Defendants’ motion.

I

This dispute is based upon a claim of employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the CM Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. In 1979, Lacy began working at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in Detroit,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foster v. AlliedSignal Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  2. Shapira v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1998
  3. Christ Church of The Gospel Ministries d/b/a Evangel Christian Churches v. Guideone Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  4. Seifu v. Postmaster General, US Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API