Legal Opinion
Adams Et Ux. v. Winnett Et Ux.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided April 19, 1941PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, P. J.
The original bill in this cause was filed by J. F. Adams and wife against D. F. Winnett and wife to enjoin them from obstructing or interfering with the complainants’ right of way over their property.
Winnett had conveyed to Cummings and Melton a lot in Woodbury, Tennessee (a long narrow strip of land), adjoining his property with right of egress and ingress over his property. Adams owned a lot in the same block, on a street running back 70 feet to the Winnett and Cummings and Melton lots, the rear of his lot abutting on the side of the Cummings and Melton property. Adams leased to the U. S.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Diocese of Trenton v. TomanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- McCullough v. Broad Exchange Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Cosmopolitan Life Insurance v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Central Produce Co. v. General Cab Co. of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
- Southern Railway Co. v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Cellco Partnership v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- House v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
- McCammon v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- McAmis v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
- Ogle v. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.