Diocese of Trenton v. Toman
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill, answer, replication and proofs. The controversy in this case relates to the extent of an easement in an alleyway leading from the easterly side of North Warren street, in the city of Trenton, between the property of the complainant on the north, the St. James Day Nursery, No. 136 North Warren street, and the Turkish Bath House on the south, No. 132 North Warren street.
Read the full summary
On bill, answer, replication and proofs. The controversy in this case relates to the extent of an easement in an alleyway leading from the easterly side of North Warren street, in the city of Trenton, between the property of the complainant on the north, the St. James Day Nursery, No. 136 North Warren street, and the Turkish Bath House on the south, No. 132 North Warren street. The easement .in question was reserved in a deed from Samuel Evans and wife and the executors of Joseph H. Reading to William F. Pitcher, March 30th, 1858. The Trenton Turkish and Russian Bath Company has succeeded to…
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, V. C.
The complaipant’s bill prays for an injunction restraining the defendants, the Toman brothers, from using the alleyway between the lands of the complainant, No. 136 North Warren street, and the lands of the bath company, No. 132 North Warren street, as a passageway for automobiles entering or leaying their garage building, through which, admittedly, they have the right of ingress, egress and regress over the alleyway for horse-drawn vehicles in connection with their lot in the rear of the bath company’s premises, and which was formerly a part of the same lot.
The first and second…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Greene v. CannyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Shaver v. EdgellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
- St. James' Church v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Webber v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Farley v. BryantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Penn Bowling Recreation Center, Inc. v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Adams Et Ux. v. Winnett Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
- Mendez v. BowieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Lames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.