Southern Railway Co. v. Underwood
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
No petition for Certiorari was filed.
1Opinion of the CourtPortrum, J.
In this case, the defendant in error has filed a motion to strike the bill of exceptions and affirm the judgment because it affirmatively appears that the bill of exceptions does not contain .all the evidence. The motion sets out the following items of evidence which is claimed are not a part of the bill of exceptions:
1. A blackboard containing a sketch of the premises in question.
2. Exhibit 1 to the testimony of Carl Hammond, which is a map introduced by the plaintiff below at the hearing.
3. The mortality tables.
4. A written statement made by the defendant’s witness, Action Ratledge,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Battier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Ransom v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Scopes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. MarlinTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Eatherly v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adams Et Ux. v. Winnett Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
- Bourne v. BarlarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Renner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Central Produce Co. v. General Cab Co. of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
- Central Produce Co. v. General Cab Co. of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.