Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood of Dutchess-Ulster, Inc. v. Steinhaus
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 14, 1995No. 1304, Docket 94-9016PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Planned Parenthood of Dutchess-Ulster, Inc. (“plaintiff’ or “Planned Parenthood”) appeals from the sua sponte decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, J.) to abstain from adjudicating its complaint. Planned Parenthood, a provider of family planning services, alleged that defendant-appellee William Steinhaus (“Stein-haus”), the County Executive of Dutchess County, New York, and defendant-appellee Dutchess County (“the County”), refused to contract with it in reprisal for its advocacy in favor of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Hudson River-Black River Regulating DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Hartford Courant Co. v. PellegrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- HACHAMOVITCH v. DeBUONOCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- People United for Children, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Chrysler Corporation v. Kolosso Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.