Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corporation v. Kolosso Auto Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 18, 1998No. 97-3879PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

A clause in Chrysler’s franchise contract with one of its dealers, Kolosso Auto Sales, forbids Kolosso to change the location of the dealership from the address in Appleton, Wisconsin specified in the contract unless it gets Chrysler’s written permission. The contract was made in 1988, at a time when the Wisconsin Motor Vehicle Dealers Law, Wis. Stat. § 218.01, did not expressly limit an auto manufacturer’s right to include such a provision in a dealership contract. But in 1993 the legislature enacted and made applicable to existing as well as to new contracts an amendment…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Donohue v. ManganoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Lipscomb v. Columbus Municipal Separate School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. To-Am Equipment Co., Inc. v. Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. BransonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API