Legal Opinion

Patricia P. Kean v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Robert W. Kean, III v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 10, 2005No. 19-3169PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated tax appeals arise from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s tax treatment of payments made by Robert Kean, pursuant to a series of support orders issued pendente lite during a divorce proceeding. The recipient of those payments, Patricia Kean, argues that the Commissioner and Tax Court erred in concluding that those payments were “alimony or separate maintenance payments” (hereinafter “alimony”) as defined by I.R.C. § 71(b).

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Patricia P. Kean (Ms. Kean) and Robert W. Kean, III (Mr. Kean) were married on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Andrew Gerardo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  5. Lovejoy v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Johanson v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. In re the Marriage of McCauslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Stedman v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
  4. Wolens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. H. Michael Muniz v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API