Legal Opinion

H. Michael Muniz v. Commissioner of IRS

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 13, 2016No. 15-14478UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

H. Michael Muñiz, an attorney proceeding pro se 1 , appeals the Tax Court’s deter- ruinations regarding his tax deficiency for the 2011 tax year. Muñiz raises numerous issues on appeal, but the central dispute is relatively straightforward. On his 2011 tax return, Muñiz deducted $45,000 from his gross income as alimony paid. According to Muñiz, this amount was “lump sum” alimony, as defined by Florida state law, ordered in connection with his dissolution proceedings. The Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (“Commissioner”) audited Muñiz’s tax return and subsequently disallowed the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. In Re Rawson Food Service, Inc., Debtor. Flav-O-Rich, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Rawson Food Service, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Jose F. Olivares v. Winston Martin, Director, San Antonio Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Richard E. Hoover v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gary A. Wolens v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2017
  2. Shleifer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API