Legal Opinion

Lovejoy v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 18, 2002No. 00-9031PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant John H. Lovejoy appeals the tax court’s determination that certain support payments he made to his ex-spouse during divorce proceedings were not deductible under the Internal Revenue Code. The payments were unallocated, meaning there was no- designation as to whether they applied to child support (which is not deductible) or spousal maintenance (also known as alimony, which is deductible). This case turns on whether Lovejoy’s obligation to make these payments would have terminated automatically had his spouse died; they qualify as deductible alimony…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Richard E. Hoover v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Love Box Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Estate of Burford v. BurfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Abrams v. ConnollySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Patricia P. Kean v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Robert W. Kean, III v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Johanson v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Kean v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  4. Boltinghouse v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  5. George v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API