Legal Opinion
Stedman v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided October 27, 2008No. 10802-05UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACK R. STEDMAN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Stedman v. Comm'r
No. 10802-05
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2008-239; 2008 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 234; 96 T.C.M. (CCH) 273;
October 27, 2008, Filed
Jack R. Stedman, Pro se.
Michael W. Bitner, for respondent.
Thornton, Michael B.
MICHAEL B. THORNTON
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THORNTON, Judge: Respondent determined a $ 1,928 deficiency in petitioner's 2002 Federal income tax and a $ 386 accuracy-related penalty under section 6662. 1 The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner is entitled to deduct as alimony court-ordered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richard E. Hoover v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Patricia P. Kean v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Robert W. Kean, III v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Johanson v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kean v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
- Zinsmeister v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Courtland L. Logue, Jr. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2017
- Derrick Davidson & Angela Davidson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
- Glatfelter v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- Rodkey v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009