Legal Opinion
Richards v. Jain
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 17, 2001No. C00-2140ZPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ZILLY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Disqualify, docket no. 46. The Court heard oral argument on October 4 and took the matter under advisement. The Court having reviewed the briefs of the parties and considered the argument of counsel now GRANTS Defendants’ motion. The law firm of Hagens Berman LLP is hereby disqualified from further representation of Plaintiffs in this case.
BACKGROUND
Naveen Jain and InfoSpace, Inc. (“Defendants”) move to disqualify Plaintiffs’ counsel, Hagens Berman LLP (“Hagens Berman”), because counsel had access to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re MeadorTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Papanicolaou v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- United States Ex Rel. Lord Electric Co. v. Titan Pacific Construction Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
- Harris by and Through Ramseyer v. BlodgettDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maldonado v. New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Foss Maritime Co. v. BrandewiedeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Felman Production, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2010
- United States v. StewartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 v. Commercial Cooling and Heating, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.