Legal Opinion

Papanicolaou v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 15, 1989No. 88 Civ. 4117PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

On May 25,1989, the partner at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy who was in charge of the defense of this action discussed the merits of this case with the plaintiff for an hour and a half outside the presence of the plaintiff’s counsel. The partner admits that he violated Rule 4.2 of the American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct, although he states that he did not think it applied. 1 The plaintiff has now moved to disqualify both the responsible partner and his law firm from participating any further in this action.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Berkson v. Gogo LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. MMR/Wallace Power & Industrial, Inc. v. Thames AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  4. Camden v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  5. Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API