Legal Opinion
Glasscock v. Liverpool, London & Globe Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 17, 1916No. 5594PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Hays County; Frank S. Roberts, Judge. Action by W. D. Glasscock against the Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance Company, with petition of intervention by Fannie Man-love, seeking judgment against defendant. Judgment for plaintiff, motions by plaintiff and intervener for new trial overruled, and they except and appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.
Appellee concedes the correctness of appellant’s statement of the nature and result of this suit, which is as follows:
“This is an action by plaintiff W. D. Glasscock against the Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance Company of London, England, in which suit Miss Fannie Manlove intervened. On February 10, 1915, plaintiff filed his original petition, same being a suit upon an insurance policy for the sum of $1,750, alleging that on the 26th day of September, 1914, plaintiff was the owner of a certain warehouse building in the town of San Marcos, and that plaintiff also held a policy of insurance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rawl v. American Central Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Lee v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Dumphy v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phœnix Ins. v. American Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. Texarkana Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Hall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. Storecraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Farrington v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.