Lee v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from Qoolc, J., at November Term, 1910, of Harnett. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Clark.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
Plaintiff Lee owned a hotel at Dunn wbicb was under mortgage to bis coplaintiff, Godwin. Best was agent for eacb of tbe -three defendant insurance companies. He insured tbe hotel, in August, 1909, in tbe Shawnee Insurance Company, for $1,000; in tbe Eoyal Insurance Company, for $1,000; and in tbe New Hampshire Insurance Company, for $1,000. Tbe premiums on these policies were paid by Lee and tbe policies were delivered to Godwin, mortgagee. They contained a provision: “Any loss that may be ascertained and proven to be due tbe assured under bis policy shall be held payable to E. L. Godwin,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Home Ins. v. Campbell Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Glasscock v. Liverpool, London & Globe Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- National Surety Corporation v. The Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.