Ford Motor Co. v. Abercrombie
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
Numerous decisions of administrative boards and courts of other jurisdictions, including many growing out of the same strike that is here involved, are cited in the brief of counsel for claimants, and they all held that the claimants there involved were entitled to unemployment compensation under State laws similar to our own. On the other hand, counsel for the employer have,cited in their brief decisions of other jurisdictions where, under facts and law similar to that with which we are now dealing, it was held that the claimants to compensation were disqualified.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Chrysler Corp. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Thompson v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Erwin v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Hollowell v. JoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- City of Jesup v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Park v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Barton v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.