Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Rahman v. Oncology Associates, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1999No. 99-1905PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MICHAEL joined.
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
The defendants in this case, who are radiation oncology service providers, obtained a writ of mandamus from the district court, compelling the United States (the Health Care Financing Administration (“HCFA”)) and its administering contract carriers to proceed promptly with the administrative process established for processing providers’ Medicare Part B reimbursements. The United States had suspended the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Your Home Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State of South Carolina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Lifestar Ambulance Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Bluewave Healthcare v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc. v. BurwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States Ex Rel. Rahman v. Oncology Associates, P.C. (In Re Equimed, Inc.)District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.