In Re TMI Coordinated Proceedings
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
This Memorandum Relates to All Actions Except CV-88-1676, CV-88-1677.
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court are defendants’ motion to release removal bonds and plaintiffs’ motion to remand. With respect to the motion to release removal bonds, ten of seventeen plaintiffs’ attorneys expressed nonconcurrence, but none filed an opposition to the motion. The plaintiffs’ motion to remand, on the other hand, is opposed fiercely by defendants. This court held oral argument on the motion, permitted the United States to intervene in the action because the constitutionality of an Act of Congress affecting the public interest is at issue, see 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brannon v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- American Trade Partners, L.P. v. A-1 International Importing Enterprises, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1991
- Radiation Sterilizers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.