Legal Opinion
O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided July 10, 1991No. 88-1272PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion by the Plaintiff for remand of this case to state court based upon the assertion that the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 2210(n)(2), which provides removal of cases such as this to United States District Courts, is unconstitutional. 1 This Court finds that the Act is constitutional and denies the Motion to Remand for the reasons stated herein.
JURISDICTION
On October 1, 1985, this action was commenced by O’Conner in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois in Tazewell County. 2 O’Conner’s Complaint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Sonja Lujan, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kimberly Lujan, Deceased v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992
- Radiation Sterilizers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1994