Legal Opinion
Radiation Sterilizers, Inc. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided October 31, 1994No. CS-91-155-AAM, CS-91-154-AAMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DETERMINING APPLICABLE STATE LAW
MCDONALD, District Judge.
Before the Court for resolution without oral argument 1 is Defendant Rockwell’s Mo tion for Order Determining Applicable State Law, Ct.Rec. 135 in No. CY-91-154-AAM and Ct.Rec. 219 in No. CY-91-155-AAM. Plaintiff Iotech, Inc. (“Iotech”; in No. CY-91-154-AAM only) is represented by Clifford J. Zatz, Luis R. Mejia and Cindy M. Bryton of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer and Feld, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., and James S. Berg of Halverson & Applegate, P.S., Yakima, Washington. Plaintiff Radiation Sterilizers, Inc. (“RSI”; in No. CY-91-155-AAM…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Gilberg v. Stepan Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Leaser v. Prime Ascot, L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2025