Burns v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerra, J.
1. “A contract may be either entire or severable. In the former, the whole contract stands or falls together. In the latter, the failure of a distinct part does not void the remainder. The character of the contract in such case is determined by the intention of the parties.” Code, § 20-112. “In determining whether the contract is entire or severable, the criterion is to be found in the question whether the whole quantity, service or thing — all as a whole — is of the essence of the contract. If it appear that the contract was to take the whole or none, then the contract would be entire.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Broxton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Dolan v. LifseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Hill v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Hunnicutt & Bellingrath Co. v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Iron Mountain & Helena Rail Road v. StansellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davies v. J. D. Wilson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Harvey v. J. H. Harvey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Nolley v. Maryland Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Haynie v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Williams v. CLAUSSEN-LAWRENCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.