Haynie v. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
In resolving this question we must consider whether the contract of guaranty was entire or severable. If it was entire, as will be seen from the discussion that follows, there could be no revocation. If it was severable and revocable we must then determine whether, under the counter showing, a revocation was effected.
There is an entire consideration only when all of it passes at the time of the execution of the contract, but when the guaranty is to apply not only to indebtednesses already incurred, but as *768well to future obligations, as was the case here, it is divisible and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Benefield v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Broxton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brunzell v. Golden Gate National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Milliken and Co. v. Eagle Packaging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- White v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. GierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Walter E. Heller & Co. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.