Hunnicutt & Bellingrath Co. v. Van Hoose
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Russell. Hall superior court. May 5, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
The Hunnicutt & Bellingrath Company instituted an action against Van Hoose and Pearce, in which they alleged that the defendants owned certain land in the city of Gainesville, and that in the spring of 1896 such owners entered into a contract with G. W. Foote, who was a contractor, to erect on said land a large building to be known as an auditorium, and agreed with Foote to pay him the sum of $14,200 for said building complete. It is further alleged that such - contract was in two parts; that is, that when certain portions of the work were done the owners were to pay Foote ten thousand…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Van Clief v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Royal v. McPhailSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Dingley v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Dudley v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Hollister v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Marathon Oil Co. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Prince v. Neal-Millard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Bowers v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Heim v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.